Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14806

in Andover, New YorkPopulation 1,912

50.31/ 100

Ranked #15,830 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #1,419 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

10.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

15.2 days/year

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

26.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.4 pCi/L

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Andover, New York (ZIP 14806) lands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,830th) and the bottom 18% of New York (1,419th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Childcare resides in the top 10.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 11.9% nationally, civic rests in the top 12.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 13.2% nationally. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 17% nationally. Against that, unemployment lies in the top 11.3% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 14803, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.5–35.2
High blood pressure among adults38.9%34.9–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Depression among adults21.6%18.6–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.1–44.4
Obesity among adults37.1%30.3–44.6
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.7–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.0–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.4–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.0–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.1–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%62.8–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%53.0–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.3–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.5–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%23.3–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%32.0–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.4–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–15.9
Any disability among adults31.3%27.3–35.4
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.9–18.3
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.2–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.6–18.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%12.9–18.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.5–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.1–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription85.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households56.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$74,688$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$93,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$774$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured