Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14718

in Cassadaga, New YorkPopulation 1,854

53.70/ 100

Ranked #11,082 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #1,160 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.3%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cassadaga, New York (ZIP 14718) places in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,082nd) and the bottom 33% of New York (1,160th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Childcare lands in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 11.0% nationally, humid heat settles in the bottom 16% nationally, and tree cover sits in the top 16% nationally. Modeled uninsured lies in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 5.9% nationally, and radon resides in the top 16% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 14063, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.9%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.6–35.6
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.2–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.3–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.0–44.8
Obesity among adults35.5%28.8–42.3
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.6–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.6–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.2–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.4–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.4–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%67.3–76.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%59.0–66.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.2–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.2–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.4–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.0–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%32.8–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.5–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.2–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–14.8
Any disability among adults29.7%25.5–33.8
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.4–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.2–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.4–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.8–15.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.4–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.6–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate86.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households60.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age48.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$56,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$98,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$870$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured