Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14418

in Branchport, New YorkPopulation 1,149

55.45/ 100

Ranked #8,916 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #988 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.77 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

13.6%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.2%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Branchport, New York (ZIP 14418) ranks in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,916th) and the bottom 43% of New York (988th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 3.2% nationally. Civic lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally, homeownership resides in the top 13.2% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Set against that, households without a vehicle rests in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic stands in the top 9.0% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 14478, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%28.8–35.2
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.6–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.2
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.1–10.2
Depression among adults20.0%17.3–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.3–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.7–44.6
Obesity among adults34.1%27.6–41.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%11.0–15.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.2–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%78.0–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.5–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.7–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.9%71.4–78.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.8%59.8–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%73.0–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.2–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.1–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%20.5–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%30.0–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%14.7–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.4–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.4–14.3
Any disability among adults29.3%25.1–33.6
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.8–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.0%12.7–17.6
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.7–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.7–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%8.8–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.1–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.6–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6419.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)17.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle13.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate92.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population7.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households57.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+25.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$65,577$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$193,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured