Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14818

in Burdett, New YorkPopulation 1,878

56.50/ 100

Ranked #7,760 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #909 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

72.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

11.9%

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

26.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.2%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.4 pCi/L

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Burdett, New York (ZIP 14818) lands in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,760th) and the bottom 47% of New York (909th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening stands in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lands in the top 11.4% nationally, modeled tooth loss sits in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 17% nationally. Modeled uninsured settles in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic resides in the top 13.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 17% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 14886, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.3–34.7
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.3–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.7–9.7
Depression among adults20.4%17.2–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.0–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.2–43.1
Obesity among adults30.6%23.6–38.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.3–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.0–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.4–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.2–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.5–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.8%68.2–77.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.3%58.5–65.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%70.4–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.6–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%10.7–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%19.4–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%30.1–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%14.5–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.1–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.3–14.1
Any disability among adults28.5%24.2–33.2
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.3
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.2–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.3–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%17.8–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.2–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.8–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.0–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.1–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.3–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households63.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age47.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$69,107$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$231,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,508$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.6 yr ± 3.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.61 years of 86.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured