Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12746

in Huguenot, New YorkPopulation 778

55.45/ 100

Ranked #8,921 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #989 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #71 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (bottom 7.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

82.4%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.06%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Huguenot, New York (ZIP 12746), overall, ranks in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,921st) and the bottom 43% of New York (989th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled tree cover lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and transportation noise stands in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Homeownership resides in the top 14.0% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, and housing-cost burden is in the top 7.5% nationally. Crowded housing sits in the top 9.4% nationally. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas lies in the top 18% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 12729, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.5–30.5
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.1–38.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Depression among adults18.3%15.6–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.1–40.7
Obesity among adults31.2%25.9–36.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%8.9–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.4–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%74.9–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.7–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.8–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%61.9–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%58.2–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%69.1–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.3–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.5–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%22.5–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%33.1–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.9–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.2–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.7
Any disability among adults28.5%24.8–32.4
Hearing disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.6
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.9%11.9–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%21.1–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.2–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.4–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.8–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.8–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6423.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate91.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households42.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+29.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age51.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$69,906$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$274,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,574$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured