Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11961

in Ridge, New YorkPopulation 12,315

61.30/ 100

Ranked #3,943 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #510 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #584 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

83.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

36.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.9 mi

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

14.7 mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.6%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

11.4%

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Ridge, New York (ZIP 11961) lands in the top 12.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,943rd) and the top 29% of New York (510th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: park land settles in the top 3.7% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 8.2% nationally. Modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 7.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas lies in the top 1.3% nationally, distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 10.2% nationally. PFOS in drinking water is in the top 10.5% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol settles in the top 7.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 11778, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.8 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.8 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,345 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%28.1–33.2
High blood pressure among adults37.2%34.3–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.1–13.3
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Depression among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.8%40.7–46.7
Obesity among adults28.7%25.1–32.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.3–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.5–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.6–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%82.4–86.4
Cholesterol screening among adults92.5%91.6–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.9–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.0%65.6–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%74.4–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.4–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%8.0–10.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.6–28.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%33.5–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.8–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Any disability among adults29.3%26.0–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.6–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.4–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Loneliness among adults28.3%25.1–31.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate89.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population7.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households57.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+35.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age53.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$76,216$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$420,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,044$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured