Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14024

in Bliss, New YorkPopulation 1,773

50.48/ 100

Ranked #15,594 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #1,408 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

23.1%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

27.2 mi

in the top 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bliss, New York (ZIP 14024) ranks in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,594th) and the bottom 19% of New York (1,408th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 12.3% nationally, humid heat is in the bottom 13.8% nationally, and disaster risk registers in the bottom 14.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic lies in the top 5.1% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 14009, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.07%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%27.0–33.9
High blood pressure among adults37.3%33.4–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Depression among adults22.2%19.0–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.2–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.0–43.9
Obesity among adults36.6%29.3–45.5
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%12.9–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.2–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.1–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.4–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.9–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%62.9–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.2–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%69.6–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.3–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.2–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.8–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.3–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.6%17.1–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.6–16.1
Any disability among adults30.7%26.6–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%20.6–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.4–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.0–16.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.7–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle8.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription85.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+12.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$86,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$137,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$747$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured