ZIP code
13415
in New Lisbon, New YorkPopulation 73
51.73/ 100
Ranked #13,796 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)
Ranked #1,324 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
28.2 mi
in the top 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS7thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
16 days/year
in the bottom 12.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS13thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
42.5%
in the top 13.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS87thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
13.8%
in the bottom 22% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS22ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
18.7%
in the top 22% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS78thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›The read
New Lisbon, New York (ZIP 13415), by its composite score, sits in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,796th) and the bottom 23% of New York (1,324th).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and transportation noise is at the national minimum. Homeownership lands at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 12.7% nationally. On the other side, distance to a community health center rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle resides in the top 11.0% nationally.
For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 13342, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 80%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 90%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 66%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 69%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 43%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 24%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 62%
13%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
Disability
healthier than 14%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13342
New Yorkshares a border
Score 53.85
Closest healthier
13808
New Yorkshares a border
Score 54.39
Similar health profile
61001
Illinois98% similar profile
Score 50.92
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.5% | 31.1–38.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.0% | 35.1–43.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.9% | 10.6–13.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.7% | 10.4–13.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.4% | 7.2–9.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.9% | 7.2–11.0 |
| Depression among adults | 20.1% | 17.2–23.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.2% | 11.3–15.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.5% | 38.4–46.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.7% | 27.1–38.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.7–5.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.7% | 15.5–22.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.4% | 4.8–8.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.0% | 80.6–85.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.0% | 79.2–84.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.3% | 89.7–92.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.8% | 62.4–71.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.3% | 61.0–67.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 80.1% | 73.9–85.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.8% | 11.6–16.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.7% | 10.7–17.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.2% | 23.2–33.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.3% | 30.2–40.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.8% | 16.4–24.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.9% | 13.7–18.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.8% | 13.4–18.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.9% | 10.7–15.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.4% | 26.8–36.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.3% | 7.1–9.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.1% | 7.4–11.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.4% | 14.3–21.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.7–5.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.7% | 4.7–6.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.0% | 19.2–27.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.2% | 9.9–16.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 9.5–16.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.2% | 8.8–13.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.0–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.0% | 26.3–35.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.6–8.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 19.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 11.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 14.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 64.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 34.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 59.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $83,750 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.0 yr ± 1.51 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.51 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured