Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12175

in Summit, New YorkPopulation 612

52.34/ 100

Ranked #12,997 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #1,278 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #98 of 114 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

15.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

29.9 mi

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18.2 mi

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

69.7%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.18%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

11.7%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

12.9%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Summit, New York (ZIP 12175) stands in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,997th) and the bottom 26% of New York (1,278th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: civic resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Working the other way, unemployment sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 4.1% nationally.

For clarity, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 12064, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.9–37.2
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.1–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.7–13.1
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.7–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.9–11.2
Depression among adults19.9%17.0–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.1–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.4%38.1–46.9
Obesity among adults34.1%27.6–41.0
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%10.0–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.6–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%78.9–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.5–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.3–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.3–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%60.0–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%71.7–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.2–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%22.8–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%32.2–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.2–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.3–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.8–14.5
Any disability among adults30.8%26.3–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.5–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.1–19.6
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.5–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.6–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.3–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.1–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.5–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.3
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.6–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)15.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate92.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households73.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+44.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age57.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$90,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$152,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured