Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13326

in Cooperstown, New YorkPopulation 4,586

62.70/ 100

Ranked #3,128 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.8%)

Ranked #413 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

16.3 days/year

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cooperstown, New York (ZIP 13326), in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,128th) and the top 24% of New York (413th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: grocery lands in the top 2.3% nationally, mental-health providers rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and dental providers settles in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the top 2.6% nationally, outpatient rests in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Pharmacy rests in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Civic lands in the top 9.4% nationally.

The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 13337, just across the boundary. Modeled mammography lands in the top 2.6% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.4–33.6
High blood pressure among adults35.5%31.8–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.8–13.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.8
Depression among adults18.2%15.6–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%37.3–45.1
Obesity among adults28.8%23.8–34.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.2–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.8–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.7–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.9–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults91.7%90.5–92.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.1%71.2–78.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.3–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.8%77.3–87.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.6–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.6–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%28.7–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.1–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.3–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Any disability among adults25.7%22.4–29.3
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.0–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.2–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.3–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population9.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households70.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+32.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age54.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$80,040$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$340,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,184$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured