Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13156

in Fair Haven, New YorkPopulation 2,156

52.46/ 100

Ranked #12,819 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #1,267 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Slow internet speeds

0.59%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Fair Haven, New York (ZIP 13156) stands in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,819th) and the bottom 27% of New York (1,267th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 15.0% nationally, modeled colon screening lies in the top 15% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the bottom 9.1% nationally. On the other side, slow internet speeds lies in the top 18% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare lies at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 13126, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 30.2 — 61 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,653 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.7–35.8
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.5–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.3
Depression among adults20.5%17.5–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.7–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%37.2–46.0
Obesity among adults35.1%28.3–42.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.3%15.1–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.2–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.2–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%79.6–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.0–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%66.5–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.4%54.8–62.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%69.5–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.0–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.2–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%22.8–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%32.3–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.5–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.8–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.8
Any disability among adults31.8%27.4–36.4
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.8–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.8–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.2–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.6–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Loneliness among adults32.4%27.7–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription86.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households66.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+32.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age53.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$64,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$162,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$582$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured