Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12946

in Lake Placid, New YorkPopulation 4,872

59.25/ 100

Ranked #5,408 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #671 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.38 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

83.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

6.7 days/year

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.77 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

16.8%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lake Placid, New York (ZIP 12946), by its overall standing, sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,408th) and the top 39% of New York (671st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: recreation sits in the top 2.4% nationally, grocery settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, tree cover lands in the top 3.5% nationally, and humid heat is in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and physicians rests in the top 5.6% nationally. Civic lies in the top 6.7% nationally, and park land sits in the top 8.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 12942, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.08%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.5–32.8
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.4–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Depression among adults21.2%18.1–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.5–41.7
Obesity among adults33.9%27.7–40.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.5–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.6–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.0–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.2–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.8–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%66.8–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.8–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.8%73.2–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.2–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.0–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%20.8–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%28.5–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.3–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.3–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Any disability among adults29.3%25.7–33.4
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.6–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.8–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.1–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–8.0
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.9–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle11.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate64.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population6.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households54.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$77,548$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$467,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,131$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured