Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12932

in Elizabethtown, New YorkPopulation 1,278

59.24/ 100

Ranked #5,417 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #672 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

87.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.5%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.8 per million

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

31.4%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Elizabethtown, New York (ZIP 12932) ranks in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,417th) and the top 39% of New York (672nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: grocery stands in the top 0.7% nationally, and civic lies in the top 0.8% nationally. Elder services lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and pharmacy sits in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 2.3% nationally, and colon screening settles in the top 1.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 7.7% nationally, and mammography rests in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 12942, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.1–38.7
High blood pressure among adults39.9%35.7–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.5–14.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.4–10.1
Depression among adults19.7%16.7–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.3–46.2
Obesity among adults33.7%27.4–40.4
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.1–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%78.8–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.2%80.3–85.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.9%90.7–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.5%72.4–80.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.4%67.2–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.4%75.2–86.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.4–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.4–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%21.5–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.4%26.1–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.3–20.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.8–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%9.9–13.1
Any disability among adults30.8%26.7–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.9–9.2
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.1–19.2
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.1–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.4–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.5–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.2–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle9.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription82.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate80.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+35.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age54.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$56,771$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$183,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$769$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured