Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12873

in Shushan, New YorkPopulation 886

55.59/ 100

Ranked #8,752 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #976 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #24 of 41 Glens Falls, NY ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

14.7%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

15.1 mi

in the top 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.9%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

14.0%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Shushan, New York (ZIP 12873), by its overall standing, sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,752nd) and the bottom 44% of New York (976th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled tree cover lands in the top 11.0% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, households without a vehicle resides in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 5.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 11.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles in the top 11.9% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 05250, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.5%32.3–38.8
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.6–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.2–10.4
Depression among adults19.8%17.2–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.4%40.6–48.2
Obesity among adults30.9%25.7–36.6
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.0–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%3.9–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%80.2–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%82.3–86.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.9%90.6–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.2–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.6–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%73.5–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.8–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%10.6–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%22.0–30.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%27.9–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.5–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.0–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Any disability among adults31.1%26.9–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.0–9.6
Mobility disability among adults16.5%13.8–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.2–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.8–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%8.8–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.4–13.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.7–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.6
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.9–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle14.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription85.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate66.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+24.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age48.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$103,239$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$234,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$969$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured