Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06471

in North Branford, ConnecticutPopulation 7,140

61.96/ 100

Ranked #3,541 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.1%)

Ranked #146 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #19 of 41 New Haven-Milford, CT ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.97 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

70.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.4%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST58th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

North Branford, Connecticut (ZIP 06471), on the composite measure, lands in the top 11.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,541st) and the bottom 47% of Connecticut (146th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled expected annual loss registers at the national minimum, childcare lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health is in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the top 10.5% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas registers in the top 4.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 06405, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New Haven-Milford, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.5–30.7
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.8–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.7–7.0
Depression among adults21.0%18.6–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%37.8–43.9
Obesity among adults30.7%26.4–35.2
Stroke among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.7%5.5–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%4.9–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.1–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%79.1–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%89.9–92.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.4%71.4–77.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.7%73.4–78.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.0%77.7–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.2–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.0–12.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.6–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%30.0–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.3–15.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.1–12.5
Any disability among adults25.0%21.6–28.2
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.1–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.3–13.4
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.4–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.8–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.7–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%4.9–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.8–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Loneliness among adults32.2%28.8–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population7.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$109,388$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$371,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,980$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured