Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02871

in Portsmouth, Rhode IslandPopulation 17,488

67.15/ 100

Ranked #1,235 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.9%)

Ranked #6 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (top 7.8%)

Ranked #6 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 5.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.4%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST32nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.4%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Portsmouth, Rhode Island (ZIP 02871) ranks in the top 3.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,235th) and the top 7.8% of Rhode Island (6th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and transit lands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 1.8% nationally, mammography rests in the top 2.3% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 8.0% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 02835, about 2.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.7 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $116,831 predicts 80.7 years — 3.1 years above.

    Ranked #419 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.7 ± 2.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.2 years — 3.6 years above them.

    Ranked #523 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.6%24.8–30.8
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.9–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Depression among adults22.5%19.7–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.0–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.1–41.8
Obesity among adults26.4%22.0–32.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.3–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.2%3.3–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.5–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.6%83.1–88.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.7%90.4–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.0%72.4–79.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults79.5%77.0–82.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.1%78.0–87.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.8–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%6.8–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.5%14.5–20.9
Short sleep duration among adults27.4%23.3–32.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%10.6–14.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.9–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.4–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
Any disability among adults21.0%18.1–24.2
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Mobility disability among adults9.8%8.4–11.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults16.5%14.0–19.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.7–8.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Loneliness among adults29.1%25.2–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–643.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate80.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+26.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age47.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$116,831$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$597,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,719$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured