Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12411

in Bloomington, New YorkPopulation 325

61.97/ 100

Ranked #3,535 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.1%)

Ranked #458 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #12 of 52 Kingston, NY ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.2%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.8%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.5%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bloomington, New York (ZIP 12411) ranks in the top 11.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,535th) and the top 26% of New York (458th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled transportation noise resides at the national minimum, and poverty stands in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas sits in the top 8.5% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 12419, about 1.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingston, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.6%23.5–29.7
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.4–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Depression among adults20.5%17.5–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%7.8–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.9–40.7
Obesity among adults28.9%23.7–34.4
Stroke among adults3.0%2.5–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.5–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.3–5.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.2–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.8–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.3–92.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.2–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.4%68.3–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.0–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.5–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%7.7–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%15.7–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%29.5–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.8%11.1–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.0–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.2–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.0–13.0
Any disability among adults23.1%19.1–27.2
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.3–7.8
Mobility disability among adults10.9%8.7–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.5–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.2–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.0–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%5.7–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.2–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.8–7.4
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.8–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate87.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households76.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age56.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$97,880$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$317,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured