Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11786

in Shoreham, New YorkPopulation 6,459

65.99/ 100

Ranked #1,630 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.1%)

Ranked #231 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranked #382 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$163,466

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

99.3%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

95.9%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

17.5 mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

95.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Shoreham, New York (ZIP 11786) sits in the top 5.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,630th) and the top 13.4% of New York (231st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: household income lies in the top 2.7% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the top 5.7% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 6.2% nationally. Homeownership is in the top 7.8% nationally, modeled transportation rests in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled hearing disability registers in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Working the other way, PFOA in drinking water resides in the top 6.0% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 6.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 11764, about 1.7 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%22.0–26.6
High blood pressure among adults30.3%27.7–33.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Depression among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.6–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%36.6–42.3
Obesity among adults28.2%24.6–31.8
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.9%5.7–8.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.7–5.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.1–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.3–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.9–92.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%65.5–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.5%70.2–74.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%75.6–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.6–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.6–10.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%18.0–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%32.5–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%11.4–15.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Any disability among adults23.9%21.2–26.9
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%19.0–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Loneliness among adults28.5%25.2–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription99.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$163,466$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$604,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,809$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured