Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11793

in Wantagh, New YorkPopulation 32,349

65.93/ 100

Ranked #1,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.2%)

Ranked #234 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 13.6%)

Ranked #386 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$167,068

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

140 µg/L

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

50.5%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Park land

30%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wantagh, New York (ZIP 11793), by its overall standing, sits in the top 5.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,650th) and the top 13.6% of New York (234th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income sits in the top 2.5% nationally, fiber broadband settles in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Park land stands in the top 4.7% nationally, modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled transportation is in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Set against that, lithium in drinking water lies in the top 1.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 3.9% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 11710, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.3 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $167,068 predicts 82.1 years — 1.2 years above.

    Ranked #1,382 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.1; chronic-disease standing 86.8 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,288 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.6–26.0
High blood pressure among adults29.8%27.2–32.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Depression among adults15.4%13.4–17.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.2–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%36.0–41.7
Obesity among adults27.7%24.2–31.1
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.6%4.5–6.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.2%3.6–5.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.9–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.4–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.5–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.5–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%69.3–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%70.1–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.5%17.0–22.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%35.1–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.4
Any disability among adults22.1%19.6–24.6
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Mobility disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%19.3–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.7–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate95.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population9.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$167,068$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$659,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,222$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.3 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 83.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured