Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10987

in Tuxedo Park, New YorkPopulation 4,411

65.58/ 100

Ranked #1,782 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranked #246 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranked #11 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

65.8%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$152,031

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

79.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.4 mi

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

36.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Tuxedo Park, New York (ZIP 10987) places in the top 5.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,782nd) and the top 14.3% of New York (246th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: park land settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and household income sits in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover lies in the top 5.0% nationally, and civic rests in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and arsenic is in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 8.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 07456, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.4–28.1
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.1–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Depression among adults17.1%14.6–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.2–39.8
Obesity among adults29.6%24.6–34.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.9–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.0–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.4–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%64.9–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.7%66.5–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%73.7–85.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%8.6–12.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%18.3–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.7–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.7–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.4–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Any disability among adults23.2%20.1–26.5
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.2–12.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.9–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.4–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.7%24.9–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6428.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population18.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households64.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+24.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age50.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$152,031$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$688,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,443$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured