Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11569

in Point Lookout, New YorkPopulation 945

65.19/ 100

Ranked #1,925 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.1%)

Ranked #268 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #416 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

95.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

65.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.5%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, Point Lookout, New York (ZIP 11569) lands in the top 6.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,925th) and the top 15% of New York (268th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: pharmacy settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription rests at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, cognitive disability lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and food insecurity lands in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Fiber broadband sits in the top 3.4% nationally. On the other side, floodplain exposure is in the top 0.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 0.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, pharmacy runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 11566, about 2.5 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–32.1
High blood pressure among adults35.4%32.4–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.6%11.4–13.8
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.5–7.4
Depression among adults14.7%12.7–16.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%40.6–46.4
Obesity among adults27.7%24.1–31.5
Stroke among adults3.3%2.7–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.2–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.5%2.5–4.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.6%81.3–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%82.2–86.4
Cholesterol screening among adults93.1%91.8–94.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.9%72.5–78.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.8%69.2–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%73.2–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%13.1–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%5.6–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%16.4–24.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%33.9–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%10.7–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.5–14.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%9.9–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Any disability among adults24.4%20.8–28.3
Hearing disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Independent living disability among adults5.8%4.6–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.7%9.4–14.5
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.3–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.4%2.8–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.5–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%4.8–8.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%3.5–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%4.9–8.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.3
Loneliness among adults27.6%24.0–31.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.0–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle22.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)65.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate75.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households61.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+41.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age61.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$81,635$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$1,098,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,327$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.7 yr ± 1.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.98 years of 82.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured