Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11762

in Massapequa Park, New YorkPopulation 22,487

67.74/ 100

Ranked #1,081 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.4%)

Ranked #161 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #307 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$169,624

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

140 µg/L

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Massapequa Park, New York (ZIP 11762), in overall standing, comes out in the top 3.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,081st) and the top 9.4% of New York (161st).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: household income sits in the top 2.3% nationally, fiber broadband stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and walkability resides in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally, utility shutoff stands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and transportation resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Homeownership sits in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Against that, lithium in drinking water resides in the top 1.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 6.5% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 11804, about 2.4 miles away. Beyond that, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%22.1–26.2
High blood pressure among adults30.1%27.7–32.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Depression among adults15.5%13.5–17.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.2%7.3–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%36.1–41.6
Obesity among adults27.7%24.4–31.1
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.3–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.1%3.5–4.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.1–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.3–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.5–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%68.4–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.3%69.8–74.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%70.1–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%15.1–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%7.2–9.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.5%17.1–21.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.8–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.3–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Any disability among adults22.3%20.0–24.8
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.9–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–8.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.5–6.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Loneliness among adults29.9%26.4–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate98.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households56.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$169,624$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$641,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,469$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured