Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11020

in Lake Success, New YorkPopulation 5,676

72.14/ 100

Ranked #261 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.9%)

Ranked #52 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 3.1%)

Ranked #103 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 12.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$167,148

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

6.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.2%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.7%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.2%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.0%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 11020, one of several in Lake Success, New York, by its composite score, sits in the top 0.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (261st) and the top 3.1% of New York (52nd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and physicians sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and fiber broadband lands in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the bottom 2.7% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, physicians runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 11030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.07%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.9 ± 2.4 years. A median household income of $167,148 predicts 82.1 years — 2.8 years above.

    Ranked #503 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.9%19.9–23.9
High blood pressure among adults31.9%29.2–34.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.8
Current asthma among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
Depression among adults10.6%9.1–12.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%39.2–45.0
Obesity among adults22.2%19.4–25.2
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.8%5.6–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.7–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%80.3–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.8%81.7–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.3–93.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%62.1–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%67.3–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%70.1–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.9–13.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.0%5.7–8.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%20.5–26.9
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%36.7–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.3%11.5–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Frequent physical distress among adults10.1%8.8–11.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.7%6.6–8.8
Any disability among adults21.4%18.8–24.0
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.0
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
Mobility disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.1–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.0%23.7–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.2–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.8–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.7–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate86.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population30.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$167,148$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$1,132,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,855$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.9 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 84.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured