Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11428

in Queens Village, New YorkPopulation 19,028

58.55/ 100

Ranked #5,945 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #738 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #662 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

270 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.8%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

19.6%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.1%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.6%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 11428, one of several in Queens Village, New York lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,945th) and the top 43% of New York (738th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: walkability is in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum. Fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water stands in the top 3.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum. Housing-cost burden settles in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled transportation noise is in the top 7.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 11001, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.0%18.0–22.1
High blood pressure among adults32.9%30.4–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Depression among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%37.3–43.1
Obesity among adults23.8%20.9–27.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%11.3–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%9.1–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.6–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%78.2–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.4–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%61.2–66.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%55.5–59.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%74.6–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%11.2–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.3–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%28.4–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%37.3–42.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%19.1–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.2–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.9–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Any disability among adults29.9%27.2–32.7
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.4%32.4–38.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.1%21.8–26.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.6–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%17.4–21.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Loneliness among adults40.5%37.3–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)17.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle19.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate73.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population54.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age46.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$91,296$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$684,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,947$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured