Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11367

in Flushing, New YorkPopulation 40,923

62.10/ 100

Ranked #3,460 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.8%)

Ranked #449 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #550 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

21.4%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

200 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

28.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.6%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

44.7%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.7%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 11367, one of several in Flushing, New York, in overall standing, comes out in the top 10.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,460th) and the top 26% of New York (449th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled obesity rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, walkability settles in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Grocery rests in the top 8.3% nationally. Against that, households without a vehicle settles in the top 2.6% nationally, and lead in tap water lands in the top 3.2% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum. Housing-cost burden lands in the top 5.7% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the top 5.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 11365, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.2 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $75,061 predicts 78.9 years — 4.3 years above.

    Ranked #155 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.3%17.4–21.3
High blood pressure among adults30.6%28.1–33.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Depression among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%37.4–42.9
Obesity among adults21.4%18.6–24.2
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.7–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.4–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.8–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%87.1–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%62.5–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.6%57.5–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%74.3–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%9.0–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%25.7–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%33.6–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.8–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.6–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.8–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.6–13.2
Any disability among adults27.3%24.8–29.9
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%27.4–33.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.6%17.6–21.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.5–15.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Loneliness among adults38.1%35.0–41.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)16.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle28.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate50.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population39.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households39.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age35.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$75,061$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$493,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,900$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured