Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11364

in Oakland Gardens, New YorkPopulation 35,276

68.71/ 100

Ranked #831 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranked #125 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #251 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

17.5%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

190 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.1%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.4%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

19.2%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Oakland Gardens, New York (ZIP 11364) sits in the top 2.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (831st) and the top 7.3% of New York (125th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled obesity is in the bottom 0.4% nationally, walkability rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum. Modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and park land resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Working the other way, lead in tap water settles in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 5.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 11362, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.4 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $98,359 predicts 80.0 years — 4.4 years above.

    Ranked #138 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.6%17.6–21.6
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.7–33.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Current asthma among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%4.1–5.2
Depression among adults12.1%10.6–13.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%40.6–46.7
Obesity among adults17.5%15.1–20.0
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%7.3–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.5–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.9–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.9–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%63.5–68.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.4%63.4–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%76.6–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.8%7.6–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%24.5–30.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%31.9–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults11.3%10.0–12.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Any disability among adults24.1%21.8–26.4
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Independent living disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%28.0–33.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Loneliness among adults36.6%33.5–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.3–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)13.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle14.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate70.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population44.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$98,359$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$806,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,336$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.4 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 84.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured