Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10708

in Bronxville, New YorkPopulation 22,482

68.99/ 100

Ranked #766 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.4%)

Ranked #118 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 6.9%)

Ranked #238 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

220 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.3%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.9%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.6%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.1 ppb

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.9%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bronxville, New York (ZIP 10708), overall, ranks in the top 2.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (766th) and the top 6.9% of New York (118th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: walkability lies in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled obesity stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Physicians registers in the top 5.2% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health settles in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Set against that, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 2.3% nationally, and transportation noise sits in the top 3.5% nationally. Lead in tap water lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 7.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 10707, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $126,343 predicts 81.0 years — 2.9 years above.

    Ranked #474 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.7; chronic-disease standing 88.9 — 76 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,934 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.8–27.2
High blood pressure among adults28.3%25.8–30.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.3
Depression among adults16.6%14.5–18.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%34.0–39.5
Obesity among adults23.3%20.3–26.3
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%6.9–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%4.1–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.3–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%79.1–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.8%90.6–92.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.4%69.0–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.0%72.6–77.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.1%77.0–86.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.3–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%6.5–8.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%15.8–20.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.0%28.6–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.1–11.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Any disability among adults21.0%18.5–23.4
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Mobility disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.8–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.8–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)64.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate75.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population15.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households45.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$126,343$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$511,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,234$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured