Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10550

in Mount Vernon, New YorkPopulation 38,972

49.57/ 100

Ranked #16,849 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #1,467 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #796 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,403 units

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

42%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

51.6%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

28.2%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

17.5%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 10550, one of several in Mount Vernon, New York lands in the bottom 47% nationally (16,849th) and the bottom 15% of New York (1,467th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled short sleep lands in the top 1.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the top 2.6% nationally, and homeownership settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity resides in the top 3.1% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the top 4.2% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 0.7% nationally, fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum, and walkability lies in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 3.2% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 10470, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.5 ± 1.1 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.4 years — 3.9 years below them.

    Ranked #2,985 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.3 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.5 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #1,574 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%23.0–27.1
High blood pressure among adults37.2%34.5–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults15.5%13.6–17.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.5–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%31.1–36.2
Obesity among adults36.1%32.2–39.8
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.1%16.9–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.6–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.4–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%79.1–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.7–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%61.2–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.7%51.7–57.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.2%76.0–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%13.3–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%28.8–35.3
Short sleep duration among adults46.3%42.4–50.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.5–26.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.1–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.8–16.9
Any disability among adults31.0%28.0–33.8
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.7–11.8
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.5–19.0
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.7
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.4–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.4%27.9–34.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.6%27.4–33.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.0%26.9–32.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.7%23.8–29.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.5–16.8
Loneliness among adults37.5%33.6–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.5%15.4–19.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6410.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)16.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)11.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle42.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription76.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)51.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate28.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population35.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households31.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age39.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$60,701$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$494,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,532$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured