Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10162

in New York, New YorkPopulation 1,603

63.20/ 100

Ranked #2,857 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.0%)

Ranked #375 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #507 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

18.3%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

66.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

6.3%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

0.67%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

4.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

21.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.3%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

44.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

50.3%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 10162, one of several in New York, New York ranks in the top 9.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,857th) and the top 22% of New York (375th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled obesity stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and physicians sits in the top 1.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and park land stands in the top 2.9% nationally. By contrast, households without a vehicle sits in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 0.8% nationally, and homeownership stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 2.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 3.0% nationally.

Against its neighbors, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 10021, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.7%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.3 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 92.5 (top 10%) — 91 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,945 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.4%21.5–25.5
High blood pressure among adults27.8%25.7–30.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.7–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%3.8–5.7
Depression among adults19.6%17.8–21.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%36.4–41.4
Obesity among adults18.3%16.1–20.9
Stroke among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.0%3.3–5.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.0%3.1–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.5–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%79.2–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.2–92.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%64.5–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%70.3–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%71.7–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.3%19.4–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.0%6.0–10.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.5%14.7–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%28.7–34.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.6%10.7–14.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.0%7.6–10.6
Any disability among adults22.0%19.3–24.9
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Independent living disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Mobility disability among adults10.6%8.9–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.2–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.3–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.2–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%5.7–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.6–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.3–6.4
Loneliness among adults34.1%30.6–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.0–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)1.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)68.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle66.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate0.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population17.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+38.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age53.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$114,139$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.7 yr ± 3.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.79 years of 87.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured