Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08026

in Gibbsboro, New JerseyPopulation 2,435

60.36/ 100

Ranked #4,578 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranked #372 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #151 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

82.3%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

4.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

89.6%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89.6%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Gibbsboro, New Jersey (ZIP 08026) sits in the top 14.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,578th) and the bottom 36% of New Jersey (372nd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: dental providers resides in the top 0.9% nationally, physicians lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and recreation is in the top 10.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas rests in the top 1.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum. PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 8.8% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lands in the top 9.1% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 08043, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%23.0–28.7
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.4–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%4.8–7.1
Depression among adults18.9%16.3–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.4–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%36.0–42.8
Obesity among adults27.0%22.8–31.6
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%11.1–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.5–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.3–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.5–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.6–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.6–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.9–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.6–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.3–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.3–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%19.4–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%33.8–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.0–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Any disability among adults27.0%23.2–31.1
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.6–13.6
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.0–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.6–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%4.9–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.0–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.3%28.5–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households35.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$100,313$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$308,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,420$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured