Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10036

in New York, New YorkPopulation 31,036

68.54/ 100

Ranked #877 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.8%)

Ranked #133 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 7.7%)

Ranked #257 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

2,557 units

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

18.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

87.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

23.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

29%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

10.5%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

23.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 10036, one of several in New York, New York places in the top 2.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (877th) and the top 7.7% of New York (133rd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Civic lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Recreation registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Pulling the other way, households without a vehicle sits in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the top 1.3% nationally. Homeownership resides in the bottom 1.4% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 10017, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.8%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 21.4; chronic-disease standing 97.8 (top 10%) — 76 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,942 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.4%15.1–18.0
High blood pressure among adults23.5%21.9–25.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.2–6.2
Current asthma among adults8.9%8.2–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Depression among adults17.9%16.2–19.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.6%6.9–8.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.6%31.5–36.1
Obesity among adults18.2%16.2–20.7
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.9–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.9–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.0%67.7–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%75.4–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%87.0–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.7–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%63.4–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%75.6–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.3%21.3–25.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.1%7.2–9.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.0%16.3–20.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%32.8–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%12.3–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%13.1–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults9.8%9.0–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.0%9.1–11.2
Any disability among adults20.7%19.0–22.8
Hearing disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Mobility disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%24.0–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults38.0%34.7–41.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)70.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle87.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate10.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population30.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households58.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$95,638$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$952,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,358$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured