Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07649

in Oradell, New JerseyPopulation 8,235

73.51/ 100

Ranked #128 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.4%)

Ranked #32 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 5.5%)

Ranked #56 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 6.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$221,322

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.7%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.3%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.8%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.6%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

11 ppb

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.8%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Oradell, New Jersey (ZIP 07649) sits in the top 0.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (128th) and the top 5.5% of New Jersey (32nd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: household income settles in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled transportation stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally, dental providers sits in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled obesity registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Physicians lies in the top 2.8% nationally. On the other hand, lead in tap water settles in the top 2.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 07627, about 1.4 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 20.5; chronic-disease standing 93.7 (top 10%) — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,677 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.9%18.8–23.2
High blood pressure among adults31.1%28.5–33.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Depression among adults14.4%12.4–16.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%38.5–44.8
Obesity among adults22.9%19.7–26.6
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.1%3.3–5.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.3–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.3–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.9–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults92.5%91.4–93.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%67.2–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.9%74.4–79.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%74.5–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.1–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.3%5.0–7.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.1%13.8–18.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%31.2–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.0%7.8–10.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Any disability among adults18.0%15.7–20.5
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Independent living disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Mobility disability among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.7–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.8–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.6–7.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults2.8%2.1–3.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–7.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Loneliness among adults30.5%27.1–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.3%2.8–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–640.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)1.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)71.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription98.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate90.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population17.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$221,322$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$737,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$2,305$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured