Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06782

in Plymouth, ConnecticutPopulation 1,978

58.29/ 100

Ranked #6,163 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #193 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

66.2%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$124,708

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST71st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Park land

15.8%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.3%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.0%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Plymouth, Connecticut (ZIP 06782) lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,163rd) and the bottom 30% of Connecticut (193rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled expected annual loss lands at the national minimum, and fatal road crashes registers at the national minimum. Household income sits in the top 8.3% nationally, and park land rests in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 8.5% nationally, and poverty stands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outpatient lies in the top 9.9% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas resides in the top 5.6% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 9.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 06787, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.4–33.2
High blood pressure among adults32.7%29.7–36.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Depression among adults21.9%19.3–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%37.3–44.2
Obesity among adults28.3%24.1–33.5
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.9–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.2–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.3–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.8–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.6–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.5%67.9–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%65.5–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.2–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.4–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.9%20.2–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%28.5–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.5–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.0–13.5
Any disability among adults26.1%22.7–29.9
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.9–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.3–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.9–12.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.0–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.9–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults29.9%26.2–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate90.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population6.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households54.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age50.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$124,708$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$326,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,438$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured