Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06249

in Lebanon, ConnecticutPopulation 7,116

60.64/ 100

Ranked #4,375 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #164 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #13 of 30 Norwich-New London, CT ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.6%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Lebanon, Connecticut (ZIP 06249) sits in the top 13.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,375th) and the bottom 41% of Connecticut (164th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled expected annual loss sits at the national minimum, modeled colon screening registers in the top 0.8% nationally, and childcare lands in the top 5.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Elder services settles in the top 10.8% nationally, and civic stands in the top 10.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the bottom 9.4% nationally, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the top 14.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 06415, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Norwich-New London, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.0–31.1
High blood pressure among adults34.4%31.0–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.2–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%4.9–7.6
Depression among adults23.7%20.8–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.7–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.0–40.9
Obesity among adults31.5%26.7–37.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.6–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.9–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%4.9–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.0–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.8–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%88.8–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.6%74.2–80.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%69.0–74.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%72.8–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.9–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.0%7.7–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%18.4–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%31.6–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%12.4–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.5–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%10.9–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.4–14.7
Any disability among adults26.3%22.4–30.7
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.0–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.5–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.6–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.0–11.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.2–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.6–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.1
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.7–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.6–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households53.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$109,135$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$345,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,630$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured