Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06243

in East Killingly, ConnecticutPopulation 83

56.37/ 100

Ranked #7,903 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #209 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #50 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$122,083

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

29.2%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

12.4 mi

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

17.6%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

East Killingly, Connecticut (ZIP 06243), by its overall standing, sits in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,903rd) and the bottom 25% of Connecticut (209th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled expected annual loss stands at the national minimum, poverty lands at the national minimum, and homeownership is at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Household income sits in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 10.6% nationally. By contrast, floodplain exposure stands in the top 10.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 02825, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.6%21.9–27.6
High blood pressure among adults34.5%31.0–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%4.8–7.5
Depression among adults22.8%19.8–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.8–41.2
Obesity among adults33.7%28.7–39.2
Stroke among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.3–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.1–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.2–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.7–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%87.6–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%67.9–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.3%63.4–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%66.6–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.9–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%10.5–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%19.8–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%35.0–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%12.7–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.2–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.2–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%10.2–15.0
Any disability among adults25.7%21.5–30.1
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults10.6%8.6–12.9
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.0
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.1–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.2–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.0–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.5–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.2
Loneliness among adults30.6%26.3–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–6419.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households70.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+6.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$122,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured