Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02876

in Slatersville, Rhode IslandPopulation 355

62.67/ 100

Ranked #3,150 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranked #26 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #27 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

78.6%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST32nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.3 mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.56%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.0%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

21.8%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Slatersville, Rhode Island (ZIP 02876), overall, ranks in the top 9.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,150th) and the top 34% of Rhode Island (26th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled colon screening registers in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and poverty settles in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Set against that, homeownership rests at the national minimum, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 02838, about 4.4 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.6–27.7
High blood pressure among adults32.1%29.2–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%4.8–7.3
Depression among adults24.0%21.2–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%31.1–37.2
Obesity among adults29.6%25.1–34.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.5–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.2–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.4–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%80.9–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%88.4–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years78.6%75.8–81.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.4%72.7–77.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.1%78.5–87.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%16.2–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.0–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%18.1–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%29.5–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.0%11.6–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.7–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.5–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%10.6–15.0
Any disability among adults26.4%22.8–30.5
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.7–8.0
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.0–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%2.9–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.6–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.0–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.3–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.0–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.1
Loneliness among adults35.6%32.0–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households8.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+45.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age50.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.60 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured