Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02814

in Chepachet, Rhode IslandPopulation 7,587

60.31/ 100

Ranked #4,627 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.5%)

Ranked #41 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #52 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

85.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.2%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

17.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 34% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US66th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Chepachet, Rhode Island (ZIP 02814) sits in the top 14.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,627th) and the bottom 47% of Rhode Island (41st).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled mammography settles in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled colon screening stands in the top 1.3% nationally, and transit is in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation registers in the top 10.4% nationally, and fiber broadband lands in the top 11.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the bottom 11.1% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 9.1% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 02828, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.7–29.9
High blood pressure among adults34.1%31.0–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.6
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.2–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.5–7.4
Depression among adults23.9%21.1–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.9–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%33.1–39.5
Obesity among adults30.9%26.2–35.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.5–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%3.8–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.7–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.9%82.5–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.8%90.5–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.7%73.5–79.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.1%72.3–77.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.8%81.9–89.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%9.1–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%19.1–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%29.9–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Any disability among adults26.0%22.8–29.1
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.0–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%18.2–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.9–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.1–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Loneliness among adults34.1%30.8–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate91.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households64.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+22.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age52.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$110,764$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$390,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$970$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.1478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured