Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05658

in Marshfield, VermontPopulation 1,725

54.71/ 100

Ranked #9,814 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #147 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

25.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.8%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

13 days/year

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

29 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 41% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US59th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Marshfield, Vermont (ZIP 05658) stands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,814th) and the bottom 41% of Vermont (147th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and obesity registers in the bottom 13.9% nationally. On the other side, slow internet speeds lies in the top 8.2% nationally, modeled energy burden is in the top 10.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 16% nationally.

For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 05650, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.6–33.0
High blood pressure among adults32.7%29.6–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.2–9.1
Depression among adults28.3%25.3–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.9–37.8
Obesity among adults28.9%24.8–33.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.7–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.3–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%72.3–77.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.5–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.1–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.5%66.4–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%68.3–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%10.9–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.4%16.9–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults25.2%21.7–29.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.5–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.4–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.0–15.1
Any disability among adults28.3%24.6–32.5
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.3–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.1–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households50.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$72,292$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$243,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,414$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.6 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 85.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured