Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05150

in North Springfield, VermontPopulation 418

48.65/ 100

Ranked #18,136 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #234 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

54.5%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

11.5%

in the bottom 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.6%

in the top 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.5%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

1.2%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.9%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

North Springfield, Vermont (ZIP 05150), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 43% nationally (18,136th) and the bottom 6.1% of Vermont (234th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: poverty lies at the national minimum. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 10.4% nationally, housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 12.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled energy burden sits in the top 6.3% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 10.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 05143, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.8%30.9–36.8
High blood pressure among adults37.9%34.6–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.5–12.7
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.2–11.6
Depression among adults28.2%25.1–31.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.3–38.8
Obesity among adults31.4%26.8–36.2
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%11.8–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.1–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.9–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.7%71.3–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.9–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.0–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.4–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%65.9–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.4–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.8–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.2–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.8–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.6–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.1–17.4
Any disability among adults33.3%29.3–37.6
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.5–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households95.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+44.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age60.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$68,108$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$182,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured