Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04344

in Farmingdale, MainePopulation 3,017

47.90/ 100

Ranked #19,052 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #214 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

39.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

65.6%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Farmingdale, Maine (ZIP 04344) ranks in the bottom 41% nationally (19,052nd) and the bottom 48% of Maine (214th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled arsenic sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and energy burden is in the top 7.9% nationally. More encouragingly, childcare settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and dental providers resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and colon screening lands in the top 10.6% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 04345, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.8–37.6
High blood pressure among adults36.4%33.3–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.3–11.5
Depression among adults28.3%25.2–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.1–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%35.1–41.3
Obesity among adults33.3%28.9–38.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.3%16.3–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%6.5–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.5–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.0–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.1–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.4–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.5%60.6–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.8–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.4–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%22.0–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%30.2–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.7–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.5–19.3
Any disability among adults36.4%32.5–40.6
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.9
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.0–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.3%13.9–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.8–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.0–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.3%14.1–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.2
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.6–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription85.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate65.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households46.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$71,635$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$249,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$911$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.68 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured