Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04963

in Oakland, MainePopulation 7,524

51.96/ 100

Ranked #13,496 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #147 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

21.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

63.6%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oakland, Maine (ZIP 04963) ranks in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,496th) and the top 36% of Maine (147th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: mental-health providers stands in the top 2.5% nationally, and physicians sits in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outpatient stands in the top 11.3% nationally, modeled colon screening sits in the top 11.9% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides in the top 15% nationally. Home broadband subscription stands in the top 16% nationally, and modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic resides in the top 5.8% nationally, and pfas stands in the top 6.6% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 04352, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%30.1–35.6
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.2–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Depression among adults28.1%25.1–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%34.2–40.5
Obesity among adults32.4%28.2–36.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.2–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.3–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.2–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.5–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.6–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%68.2–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.8–69.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.7–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%11.3–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%20.6–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%30.2–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.4–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
Any disability among adults33.7%30.4–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.4–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.5–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.8–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.9–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Loneliness among adults30.4%27.0–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households53.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age41.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$77,708$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$247,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 2.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.25 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured