ZIP code
04342
in Dresden, MainePopulation 1,645
51.63/ 100
Ranked #13,940 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)
Ranked #153 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
30.6%
in the top 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
29.8%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST22ndUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Dresden, Maine (ZIP 04342) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,940th) and the top 38% of Maine (153rd).
A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled short sleep is in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Civic resides in the top 10.4% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the top 13.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 17% nationally, and unemployment lies in the bottom 20% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic lands in the top 3.1% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.
A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 04008, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 71%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 84%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 56%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 48%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 39%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 29%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 16%
8%
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 67%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 69%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 58%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 48%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 56%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 51%
13%
Disability
healthier than 55%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
04008
Maineshares a border
Score 52.64
Closest healthier
04535
Maineshares a border
Score 56.72
Similar health profile
04963
Maine96% similar profile
Score 51.96
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.0% | 31.8–38.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 36.8% | 33.3–40.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.1% | 9.1–11.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.6% | 11.2–14.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.5–8.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.7% | 7.1–10.6 |
| Depression among adults | 28.0% | 24.8–31.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.3% | 9.7–13.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.9% | 36.4–43.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.4% | 27.7–37.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.6% | 3.1–4.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 13.0% | 10.9–15.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.9% | 5.8–10.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.0% | 73.7–79.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.7% | 78.8–84.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.5% | 85.2–89.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.1% | 65.9–73.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 67.0% | 64.0–69.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.7% | 73.1–83.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.4% | 12.1–17.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.4% | 12.2–19.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.0% | 18.2–26.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.8% | 25.8–33.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.0% | 15.7–22.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 15.7–20.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.7% | 12.7–17.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.4% | 13.0–18.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.6% | 27.4–36.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.1–9.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.9% | 6.7–9.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.4% | 11.9–17.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.7–5.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.4% | 19.7–27.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.4% | 7.6–13.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.9% | 10.2–17.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 7.5–12.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 5.9–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.1% | 27.1–35.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.7–8.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ME median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 23.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 9.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 9.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 30.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416 |
| Broadband subscription | 83.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416 |
| Homeownership rate | 88.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417 |
| Single-parent households | 70.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 61.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414 |
| Population 65+ | 24.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 24.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417 |
| Median age | 55.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 49.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413 |
| Median household income | $74,844 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396 |
| Median home value | $240,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402 |
| Median gross rent | $1,194 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ME median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.2 yr ± 1.20 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured