Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02645

in Harwich, MassachusettsPopulation 11,288

63.66/ 100

Ranked #2,629 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.2%)

Ranked #164 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #21 of 47 Barnstable Town, MA ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

78.2%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.6%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.6%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.9%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18.3 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.7%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.3 per million

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Harwich, Massachusetts (ZIP 02645), by its composite score, sits in the top 8.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,629th) and the top 31% of Massachusetts (164th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled colon screening rests in the top 1.3% nationally, and mammography resides in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 5.7% nationally, modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas lies in the top 2.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 6.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 02633, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Barnstable Town, MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.3%32.1–38.7
High blood pressure among adults37.5%33.9–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.4%12.2–14.6
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Depression among adults22.6%19.5–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.8–43.7
Obesity among adults25.9%21.2–31.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.1–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.4%2.8–4.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%80.2–85.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.4%82.9–87.7
Cholesterol screening among adults93.4%92.4–94.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.6%72.4–80.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.9%72.9–78.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.6%77.8–88.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.7–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.5–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%15.2–21.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%24.9–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.5–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Any disability among adults27.4%24.0–31.1
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.3–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.8–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–8.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.2–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
Loneliness among adults29.9%25.9–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate84.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households62.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+33.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age57.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$104,401$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$648,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,804$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured