Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03903

in Eliot, MainePopulation 7,146

56.50/ 100

Ranked #7,757 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #67 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #41 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Food insecurity

7.4%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

19.9%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.9%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.4%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.3%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.3 mi

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Eliot, Maine (ZIP 03903) comes out in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,757th) and the top 16% of Maine (67th).

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: modeled food insecurity lands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, fatal road crashes is in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 4.2% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 7.3% nationally, modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Working the other way, modeled arsenic registers in the top 6.5% nationally, and pfas stands in the top 9.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 12.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 03801, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.4%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%29.1–34.1
High blood pressure among adults35.1%32.3–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.0–11.9
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Depression among adults24.7%22.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%34.9–40.6
Obesity among adults32.4%28.4–36.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.4–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.8–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.9–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.3–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.2–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.3%70.0–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.8%68.2–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.9%77.2–85.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.7–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%10.1–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.5%16.6–22.3
Short sleep duration among adults29.4%25.9–33.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.8–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.5
Any disability among adults29.4%26.1–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.2–13.6
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%18.2–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–8.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.5–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.3–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.7
Loneliness among adults29.2%26.1–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)0.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households70.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+27.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age50.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$101,522$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$498,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured