Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03850

in Melvin Village, New HampshirePopulation 324

60.84/ 100

Ranked #4,241 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.3%)

Ranked #92 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing insecurity

5.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

21.1%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.2%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.8%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Melvin Village, New Hampshire (ZIP 03850) stands in the top 13.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,241st) and the top 38% of New Hampshire (92nd).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and transportation is in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Poverty registers at the national minimum, and homeownership lies at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and loneliness lies in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Working the other way, unemployment lies in the top 1.9% nationally.

For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 03254, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%32.7–39.8
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.2–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.5%13.1–16.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.1–9.6
Depression among adults20.0%17.2–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.5–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.1–45.8
Obesity among adults29.1%24.3–34.2
Stroke among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.0–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.7–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.8%82.1–87.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.6–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults92.5%91.2–93.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%68.2–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.4%68.2–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.2–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.4–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%7.0–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.2%16.2–24.7
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.3–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%11.7–17.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%10.5–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.0–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.8%8.1–11.7
Any disability among adults26.8%22.6–31.2
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.0–12.0
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults13.9%11.1–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.3–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.0–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.1–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.4–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.3–7.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.4–5.1
Loneliness among adults27.1%23.3–31.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.0–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–6415.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)21.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households66.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age58.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$101,298$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$428,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth88.3 yr ± 3.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.97 years of 88.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured