ZIP code
03586
in Sugar Hill, New HampshirePopulation 658
62.96/ 100
Ranked #2,989 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.4%)
Ranked #49 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 20%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$154,091
in the top 3.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
6.0%
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
7.0%
in the bottom 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.2%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.5%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.91%
in the bottom 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.3%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Obesity
26.4%
in the bottom 8.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
29%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Sugar Hill, New Hampshire (ZIP 03586) ranks in the top 9.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,989th) and the top 20% of New Hampshire (49th).
The measures split the difference for this area: household income rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 3.8% nationally, modeled transportation resides in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and poverty lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally, obesity sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and short sleep rests in the bottom 5.8% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 03574, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 94%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 97%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 87%
8%
Disability
healthier than 78%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 94%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 52%
21%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 84%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 96%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 88%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 48%
16%
Disability
healthier than 52%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 26%
21%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
03561
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 46.21
Closest healthier
03574
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 63.16
Similar health profile
03253
New Hampshire99% similar profile
Score 60.35
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.7% | 31.2–38.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.6% | 33.8–41.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.4% | 12.0–14.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 9.0–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.8% | 6.7–9.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.1% | 5.4–8.9 |
| Depression among adults | 21.9% | 19.0–25.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.0% | 9.2–12.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.7% | 36.0–43.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.4% | 21.7–31.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.8% | 3.1–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.5% | 6.9–10.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.1% | 3.8–7.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.4% | 78.1–84.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.3% | 75.9–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.9% | 90.3–93.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.9% | 69.8–77.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 72.0% | 68.9–74.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.0% | 72.0–83.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.1% | 10.7–15.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.6% | 7.0–12.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 19.0% | 15.2–23.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.0% | 24.8–33.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.0% | 11.1–17.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.6% | 10.8–14.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.2% | 10.1–14.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.2–12.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.1% | 21.8–30.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.9% | 7.6–10.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.1% | 4.9–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.1–15.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.5–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.1–4.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.1% | 15.0–21.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.0–9.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.3–6.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 4.5–7.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.5% | 3.6–5.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.2% | 23.3–31.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 3.3–5.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 59.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 38.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243 |
| Broadband subscription | 91.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243 |
| Homeownership rate | 95.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 86.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243 |
| Single-parent households | 70.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 60.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243 |
| Population 65+ | 37.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243 |
| Median age | 60.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 47.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243 |
| Median household income | $154,091 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235 |
| Median home value | $639,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237 |
| Median gross rent | $1,208 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.6 yr ± 1.09 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured