Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03823

in Madbury, New HampshirePopulation 2,203

63.14/ 100

Ranked #2,898 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranked #45 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #145 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$148,365

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.2 mi

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

22.3%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.0%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Madbury, New Hampshire (ZIP 03823) lands in the top 9.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,898th) and the top 19% of New Hampshire (45th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: household income lands in the top 4.1% nationally, fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum, and modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 4.4% nationally, housing insecurity registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic lands in the top 5.4% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. On the overall standing, ZIP 03861, less than a tenth of a mile away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 30.9; chronic-disease standing 84.3 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,744 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%23.9–29.7
High blood pressure among adults31.4%28.2–34.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.1–6.3
Depression among adults24.4%21.4–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.9–39.6
Obesity among adults31.5%26.6–36.4
Stroke among adults2.6%2.2–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.5%4.5–6.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%3.5–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%70.8–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.5–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.3–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%65.4–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.1%70.3–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%71.7–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.9–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%6.7–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.5%13.2–20.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%25.1–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.0%9.8–14.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%12.8–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%8.6–11.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.1%8.3–12.0
Any disability among adults22.4%18.8–26.0
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.4–6.4
Mobility disability among adults9.1%7.3–10.9
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.0–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.6–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.4–9.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.3–6.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.2–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.7–5.6
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.5–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.7–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)2.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population6.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households37.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$148,365$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$476,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,574$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured