Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03450

in Harrisville, New HampshirePopulation 885

63.20/ 100

Ranked #2,860 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.0%)

Ranked #42 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.4%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.1%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

75.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Harrisville, New Hampshire (ZIP 03450), in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,860th) and the top 17% of New Hampshire (42nd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled loneliness is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, childcare lies in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled transportation noise registers at the national minimum. Modeled colon screening is in the top 1.0% nationally, housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and transportation registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Civic is in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and tree cover is in the top 6.8% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 03449, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.3–38.5
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.8–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.4%12.2–14.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%5.6–9.0
Depression among adults21.8%18.7–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%8.9–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.0–41.7
Obesity among adults29.3%24.6–34.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.1–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.0–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.8–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.4–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.1–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults91.8%90.3–93.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.1%73.5–80.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.1%70.2–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.3–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%7.2–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.0%15.1–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%25.8–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%11.6–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.1–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.4–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.4–12.2
Any disability among adults27.1%22.9–31.8
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Independent living disability among adults6.0%4.9–7.2
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.0–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.4–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.0–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%15.9–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.3–9.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%3.6–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.6–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.6–5.5
Loneliness among adults26.4%22.6–30.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.4–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate94.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households71.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+35.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age58.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$103,036$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$430,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,611$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.5 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 84.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured