Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03443

in Chesterfield, New HampshirePopulation 581

60.63/ 100

Ranked #4,383 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #97 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

78.8%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.1%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.2%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Chesterfield, New Hampshire (ZIP 03443) lands in the top 13.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,383rd) and the top 40% of New Hampshire (97th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: poverty resides at the national minimum, and homeownership lands at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, and recreation sits in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 5.4% nationally, colon screening is in the top 3.0% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 03466, just across the boundary. Recreation resides in the top 2.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.5–36.1
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.3–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.0–13.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.5–8.8
Depression among adults23.5%20.5–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.2–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.8–38.9
Obesity among adults29.5%24.7–34.9
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%8.9–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.0–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.8–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.4–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.4–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.0%71.0–78.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.0%66.0–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%70.7–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.0–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%7.9–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%15.8–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%27.4–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%11.8–17.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.4–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.5–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%9.4–13.7
Any disability among adults27.5%23.4–32.1
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults12.2%9.8–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.4–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.6–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%5.9–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.2–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.3–8.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.3
Loneliness among adults28.1%24.1–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.7–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population6.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households75.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+48.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age64.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$373,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured