Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03246

in Laconia, New HampshirePopulation 17,103

54.76/ 100

Ranked #9,745 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #197 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

388 units

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.53 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.95 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

51.8%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

37.8%

in the top 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

48 intersections/sq mi

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US78th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Laconia, New Hampshire (ZIP 03246) stands in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,745th) and the bottom 19% of New Hampshire (197th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 6.2% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation sits in the top 9.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Dental providers stands in the top 11.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 5.4% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 12.3% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 03249, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $73,241 predicts 78.8 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,339 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.7 years — 6.3 years below them.

    Ranked #3,573 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.7–34.6
High blood pressure among adults35.8%32.4–39.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.1
Depression among adults23.8%20.8–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.6–39.6
Obesity among adults31.2%26.2–36.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.5–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.3–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.1–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%74.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.2–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%61.1–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.8%60.3–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%66.0–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.9–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.3–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.1–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%29.8–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.3–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%12.1–15.3
Any disability among adults30.2%26.8–33.8
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.4–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Loneliness among adults31.0%27.2–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate64.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households61.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+22.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age45.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$73,241$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$339,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,224$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured